TL;DR
Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin announced plans to remove customs officers from international airports in Democratic-led sanctuary cities. The move, still in planning, faces broad opposition from industry and political figures. The White House has not approved the proposal, and details remain uncertain.
Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin has announced a plan to remove customs officers from international airports serving Democratic-led sanctuary cities, a move that has triggered widespread criticism and remains in the planning stage.
Mullin stated that the plan is part of a broader effort to enforce federal immigration laws more effectively in sanctuary cities, which he described as obstructing federal operations. The DHS spokesperson confirmed that the agency is currently drawing up detailed plans for removing customs screening at these airports, though no final decision has been made.
The plan was initially prompted by protests at the Delaney Hall detention facility in New Jersey, where Mullin threatened to withdraw CBP officers from Newark Airport if local authorities did not improve security and cooperation. Following political backlash, Mullin clarified that the plan was not imminent but indicated that similar measures could be applied to other airports in sanctuary cities.
The White House has not endorsed the proposal, and officials have emphasized that no final policy has been implemented. Industry groups, including the U.S. Travel Association and IATA, have condemned the plan, warning it could cause significant disruptions and economic losses, particularly in cities like Newark, which could lose an estimated $8 billion in international visitor spending.
Potential Impact on International Travel and Economy
The proposed removal of customs officers from airports in sanctuary cities could severely disrupt international travel, damage U.S. global reputation, and lead to substantial economic losses. The move also raises questions about federal-local cooperation and immigration enforcement strategies, with broader implications for U.S. immigration policy and airport security.
Amazon Basics 30" Hardside Large Checked Luggage, Hardshell Suitcase With Four Multi-directional Wheels, Expandable For Up to 15% More Space, Scratch-Resistant Shell, Black
SPACIOUS DESIGN: Large size best for 2-3 week trips or vacations; measures 20.7 x 12.6 x 30.7 inches,…
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Background on Sanctuary Cities and Homeland Security Policies
In April 2025, President Trump signed an executive order requiring the DOJ to identify jurisdictions that obstruct federal immigration enforcement. The DOJ designated 18 sanctuary cities, including New York, Newark, and Los Angeles, as obstructive. Mullin’s plan appears to target these jurisdictions, citing local resistance to federal immigration laws as justification for withdrawing customs enforcement at their airports.
The controversy escalates amid ongoing debates over immigration enforcement, local autonomy, and the economic importance of international travel. Industry groups have warned that such measures could undermine U.S. commitments to global aviation standards and damage the travel sector, which is vital to the economy.
“The agency is currently drawing up plans for these sanctuary cities where local authorities aren’t allowing us to do our job and enforce federal laws.”
— a DHS spokesperson
Airport Security Simulator: Guard & Scanner
Realistic Airport Security Checkpoint — Manage busy terminals with authentic scanner mechanics and passenger flow
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Unconfirmed Details and Policy Status
It remains unclear whether the DHS will proceed with the plan, the timeline for implementation, or how extensively it will be applied across different airports. The White House has not approved the initiative, and legal or political challenges could alter its course.
Eoehro Passport Holder for Travel Essentials, Passport Wallet Cover Case for Travel Must Haves Accessories,Passport Book Holders for Women and Men(black)
Easy Access and Magnetic Button: Our passport wallet features a convenient magnetic button closure, making it easy to…
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Next Steps and Possible Developments
The DHS is expected to finalize its plans in the coming weeks, with possible hearings or political debates shaping the policy’s future. Industry groups and local officials are likely to continue opposing the measure, and the White House’s stance will be pivotal in determining whether the plan moves forward.
Sweetcrispy Carry on Luggage, Hard Shell ABS Suitcase with Double Spinner Wheels, Lightweight Expandable Rolling Suit Case with TSA Lock, 21 Inch Charcoal Black
Effortless Mobility with Dual-Wheel Design: Travel with ease using Sweetcrispy carry-on luggage, featuring a dual-wheel system for smooth…
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
What exactly is the DHS planning to do?
The DHS is developing plans to remove customs screening and officers from international airports in sanctuary cities, but no final decision has been made yet.
Why are they targeting sanctuary cities?
The plan is motivated by perceived resistance to federal immigration enforcement in these jurisdictions, which DHS claims hampers their operations.
Could this affect international travel?
Yes, industry experts warn it could cause delays, disruptions, and economic losses, especially at airports like Newark.
Has the White House approved this plan?
No, the White House has not endorsed or approved the proposal, and officials have indicated it is still in the planning stage.
When will we know more about the final decision?
The DHS is expected to finalize its plans in the coming weeks, with further details likely to emerge then.
Source: Google Trends
