TL;DR
Get smart everyday buys delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A November 10, 2026, opinion column says Hargreaves Lansdown’s private equity owners received £600 million in dividends in the year to June and £189.3 million in the three months to September. The writer contrasts those payments with losses affecting some investors, criticism of HL’s treatment of Woodford fund clients, and fees he says exceed those of some rivals. The dividend figures are attributed to The Times; the column’s broader judgments are opinion, and HL’s response is not included in the supplied material.
A commentary published by This Is Money on 10 November 2026 criticized Hargreaves Lansdown’s private equity owners after reporting that they received £600 million in dividends in the 12 months to June 2026 and another £189.3 million in the three months to September. The column, by City editor Alex Brummer, contrasts the payouts with market losses reported by some HL clients and the lack of direct compensation for investors affected by the collapse of Neil Woodford’s fund. The dividend figures are attributed to The Times; the supplied report does not include a response from HL or its owners.
Brummer says volatility in technology and artificial-intelligence stocks has hurt many funds popular with HL customers, including funds exposed through index investing and active management. As an illustration, he recounts that a family member saw an ISA portfolio fall by 10 per cent on the HL app. That is an anecdote in the column, not a measure of returns across HL customers or portfolios, and the article does not specify the period over which the fall occurred.
The column says the platform was taken private in March 2025 by buyout groups CVC and Nordic Capital, alongside the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, with co-founder Peter Hargreaves involved. It reports the dividends as figures published by The Times. Separately, it says the new owners have invested £100 million in systems. The supplied material does not set out the ownership structure, financial statements, or details of how those dividend payments were funded.
Brummer also revisits HL’s connection to the failed Woodford Equity Income Fund, saying the platform’s Wealth List continued to promote the fund until its collapse in 2019. He writes that a third of HL clients had exposure, directly or through HL’s fund of funds, and argues that clients have received no apology or direct compensation. These are claims and judgments in the opinion column; it provides no response from HL, breakdown of affected customers, or update on individual legal claims.
Dividend Payouts and Client Concerns
The dispute puts the financial returns to HL’s owners alongside questions about what customers receive from the platform and how it has handled past harm. The reported £789.3 million in dividends across the cited periods is a substantial figure, but by itself it does not establish whether the payments were appropriate, how they were financed, or what alternative use of that money would have meant for fees or services.
For customers, the more direct issues are investment performance, charges, service quality, and any remedy available to people affected by the Woodford fund. Brummer argues that HL’s fees are higher than those at some faster-growing competitors, including Interactive Investor, but the column does not provide a like-for-like fee comparison or calculate the cost for different kinds of account. Readers should distinguish the reported payouts from the writer’s argument that the proceeds ought to have been used to lower customer charges.
Products Worth Considering
Apple MacBook Air 13.6-inch Laptop with M5 Chip, 16GB Memory, 512GB SSD, Midnight
Ledger Flex Crypto Wallet
Ledger Flex Crypto Wallet with 2.8-Inch E Ink Touchscreen
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
HL’s Takeover and Woodford Legacy
Hargreaves Lansdown is a UK investment platform through which customers can hold accounts such as ISAs and invest in funds and other assets. According to Brummer, the company left the public market in a March 2025 buyout involving CVC, Nordic Capital and the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, with Peter Hargreaves as a partner. The column criticizes the former board and shareholders for accepting the offer, but gives no transaction price or account of the board’s reasoning beyond a general discussion of takeover decisions.
The Woodford fund failed in 2019, and Brummer focuses on HL’s promotion of it and customers’ exposure through the platform. The column says legal efforts to secure redress are moving slowly, without describing the claims, proceedings, or any settlement timetable. It also briefly contrasts HL’s ownership with Whitbread, saying the hotel group resisted pressure from activist investor Corvex, and mentions private equity firm KKR’s reported quarterly profits. Those comparisons are the writer’s broader commentary, not evidence about HL’s customer outcomes.
““Many of the popular funds in which they are invested have been battered by the volatility in technology and AI stocks.””
— Alex Brummer, This Is Money City editor
Details Behind the Payouts
The supplied report does not include HL’s response to the criticism, confirmation from the company or its owners of the dividend figures, or a breakdown of the payments and their funding. It also does not explain how the reported £100 million systems investment relates to the distributions, or whether the investment was made over a particular period.
The scale of customer losses is also unclear. The 10 per cent ISA decline is a single anecdote, and the column gives no representative data on returns, account balances, or the time window. On Woodford, it does not provide a verified count of clients eligible for redress, details of any apology or compensation process beyond Brummer’s assertion, or a timetable for legal claims. Its fee comparison with rivals is not supported by account-specific calculations.
Company Response and Redress
The next points to watch are whether Hargreaves Lansdown or its owners respond to the dividend and Woodford criticism, and whether they provide more detail on customer charges, the systems spending, or any compensation arrangements. The supplied article sets out no scheduled company announcement, regulatory decision, or court hearing, so there is no confirmed date for a further development.
Customers seeking to understand the effect on their own accounts would need to check their statements, investment time periods, and applicable platform charges; the column’s anecdote cannot establish an individual investor’s result. Any progress on Woodford-related claims will depend on the relevant legal processes. The source material does not state when those proceedings may conclude or whether further payments to investors are planned.
Key Questions
What dividend payments does the report describe?
The column, citing The Times, reports £600 million in dividends in the 12 months to June 2026 and a further £189.3 million in the three months to September 2026. The supplied material does not include the underlying financial statements or a response from HL’s owners.
Did all Hargreaves Lansdown customers lose 10 per cent?
No. The 10 per cent fall is an anecdote about one family member’s ISA portfolio. The column does not give a customer-wide performance figure, the portfolio’s holdings, or the period measured.
What does the column say about Woodford investors?
Brummer says HL’s Wealth List promoted the Woodford Equity Income Fund until it collapsed in 2019 and alleges that affected clients have not received an apology or direct compensation from HL. The supplied report does not include HL’s response or details of specific redress claims.
Has Hargreaves Lansdown announced a response?
No company response is included in the source material. Whether HL or its owners will comment on the reported dividends, customer fees, or Woodford-related criticism remains unclear.
Source: thisismoney.co.uk
